I agree... with all of it.

First of all the minimums ARE an improvement (though it makes the 25/1500 tables hellish).

500/1K makes sense. And maybe 2.5/5k does too for the occasional elite game, but I think a 1k/2k table might be a good addition. Is this what the 800k tables used to be?? I cant remember.

At the moment, it seems to me the 2.5/5k tables are sort of only a spiderweb. Players with millions sit and wait for starry eyed folks with 50k to show up and they stomp them.

This is legitimate, but if thats ALL the ables are used for then they might be a little too high.

As Kurt said... thanks. I think. I mean you got a lot of my freaking time here.

a sollution could be: leave the tables and just put the 800k ones in between? so we can all be happy :p

that would be kick butt

capslock should be in government. he is a powerful speaker =]

what makes you think that people i the government are good speakers, lol.

I dont think the changed tables are much of an improvement. I prefer the old days with the 800k tables. Never change a winning team.

I would vote for the new and improved cAPSLOCK! ; )

imho gpokr needs more tables, period.

it takes the fun outta the game if you can't play with your friends, and i also think that there should be more variable buy-ins/blinds, to change the ways winnings can be gained.